Taking On Issues - Political Issues and Government Policies

A Hot Discussion Forum on Government Policies and Political Issues

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Election 2016
  • Big Government
  • Healthcare
  • The Other Side
  • What’s New
  • Your Freedom

Why hasn’t NBC burned the source who gave them the bogus Cohen wiretap story?

May 4, 2018 By Takingonissues

Good question from Larry O’Connor. There’s nothing the media enjoys more than lecturing about accountability. (Wait, correction: They enjoy lecturing about their own importance to democracy more.) How’s about a little accountability for yesterday’s grand fark-up, then?

It used to be that if you requested anonymity from a media outlet and then gave it bad information, their obligation to protect that anonymity evaporated. Call it breach of contract: In exchange for actual facts, a paper would shield the source from retribution. NBC’s source didn’t deliver actual facts, so why not blow him up? It wouldn’t be a matter of pure payback for humiliating the network, either — although partly it would be that. It would perform a public service by alerting the rest of American media that NBC’s source is no longer to be trusted by anyone. Burning garbage sources theoretically improves the quality of information in public circulation going forward.

That’s the way things used to work, at least in theory. Why don’t they work that way now, wonders O’Connor:

Now that we know NBC News was wrong with this story that relied on the veracity and expertise of their anonymous sources, don’t we deserve to know who they are? Why protect these sources? We deserve to know who lied to NBC News about this story…

Why would NBC News protect a source that lied to them? Why would they protect a source that got something so terribly wrong? Why refuse to explain to their viewers HOW they got the story wrong? Is their source an incompetent or a liar? Is your reporter a liar? These things don’t just… happen. Someone screwed up.

And we, the American people, deserve to know. This is the presidency we are talking about, after all.

One possibility, identified by O’Connor, is that NBC’s source didn’t get it wrong. NBC itself got it wrong. Attorney Ken White wondered about that too:

My question: did NBC’s sources get this wrong, or did NBC reporters not understand what their sources were describing and confuse a pen register for a wiretap? https://t.co/PkTpKIVaQW

— LoomingCrisisHat (@Popehat) May 3, 2018

You would think the crack NBC investigative team would have consulted a legal expert, though, if there was any in-house confusion about the difference between a pen register and a wiretap. Which there probably wasn’t: It’s not as if the government listening in live on someone’s calls, let alone the president’s lawyer’s calls, is easily misunderstood as no different conceptually from checking their phone logs. You can have a low opinion of NBC and still think there’s someone in the news department there who grasps the distinction and would have demanded clarification if the source was vague. Especially on a scoop of this magnitude.

So yeah, the source probably had bad information himself or deliberately misled them. Why haven’t they burned him?

An obvious possibility is that that person has provided useful factual information to the network before. If you’ve got “two people with knowledge of the legal proceedings involving Cohen” willing to talk to you, as NBC did yesterday, you’re going to think carefully about alienating them by blowing them up, particularly if they’ve been good sources in the past. They might have a real bombshell for you tomorrow, after all. And even if they don’t, you’re potentially scaring away other useful sources by making a public example of them. If, say, one of Cohen’s close friends is willing to whisper to the media about what’s going on behind closed doors, which news outlet should he gift with his information? NBC, which will ruin his life by outing him if he passes along something that turns out not to be true, or ABC/CBS/CNN/Fox? The old bargain, that a source gets to keep his anonymity if and only if his information is accurate, doesn’t hold anymore in an age of fierce competition among media.

But then, I’m not sure it ever really did hold. Competition among media has always been fierce. It’s an old journalistic ethic that an outlet is *entitled* to burn an anonymous source if he passes along bad info, but how often have they ever availed themselves of that entitlement? For every bad source who gets burned, there are probably a thousand who get off scot-free, with only an internal notation at the paper or news network not to use him again left in his wake.

In fact, the tradition of burning bad sources after a garbage story lands with a thud (if it was ever really a tradition) has been replaced with a new tradition. In keeping with the media’s bottomless sanctimony about itself, the thing to do now when an outlet blows a major story is to congratulate them for owning up to it.

It was a bad mistake. But NBC fessed up and corrected the error… A clear contrast with Trump’s approach https://t.co/pomuBrNQNN

— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) May 4, 2018

It’s a shame that the White House and its allies are going to attempt to use NBC’s correction to support their narrative about fake news, when admitting to and quickly correcting a mistake is what you do only when you care about facts and honesty.

— Olivia Nuzzi (@Olivianuzzi) May 3, 2018

That wouldn’t bug me as much if it followed a meaningful period of soul-searching and contrition by the outlet and criticism from colleagues for the mistake first. But no, increasingly this is the first stop on the “major media screw-up” train after the screw-up occurs: They acknowledged it. They notified us of the error. They’re better than Trump! Hooray for media. Watch for it on journalist Twitter the next time someone gets a story wrong. It won’t be long.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Email, RSS Follow

Related

Subscribe to Taking on Issues

Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Political News

  • Amazon Paid $0 Federal Taxes on Record Profits February 17, 2019
  • Democrat-Bashing Pollster Patrick Caddell Dies February 17, 2019
  • Trump Driving Out Precious Republican Voters February 17, 2019
  • Lawfare: How Congress; Obama Made Trump's Wall Possible February 17, 2019
  • Special Counsel prosecutors say they have Communications of Stone with WikiLeaks February 17, 2019
  • Portland Police and Right-Wing Organizer Exchanged Friendly Texts February 16, 2019
  • France Replaces Mom and Dad with 'Parent-1' and 'Parent-2' February 16, 2019
  • Mueller's Team Interviewed Sarah Huckabee Sanders February 16, 2019
  • Fact-Checking Trump's Speech Declaring National Emergency February 16, 2019

Archives

New Featured Articles

  • May’s Costly Gamble
    June 8, 2017

    Theresa May gambled on an early election and lost badly: British Prime Minister Theresa May’s decision to call an early election in a bid to strengthen her grip on power appeared early Friday to have spectacularly backfired, with her Conservative Party at risk of losing its parliamentary majority, according to exit poll and partial official […]

    Email, RSS Follow
    […]
  • The New Surveillance State and the Old Perjury Trap
    March 6, 2018
    We now know that a significant number of people […]
  • Metaphor of the week
    November 17, 2017
    To cleanse the palate after a very long week, nothing […]
  • Fair weather friends say goodbye to Clinton
    January 20, 2017
    Personal Liberty Poll Exercise your right to vote. All […]
  • Don’t Mess With Fergus Falls
    December 19, 2018
    Local heroes Michele Anderson and Jake Krohn kicked […]
  • Another Saudi Coalition Bombing Slaughters a Dozen Yemeni Civilians
    April 2, 2018
    The Saudi-led coalition slaughtered a dozen members of […]
  • The government wants self-driving cars. Self-driving trucks? Not so much
    July 29, 2017
    Here are two mysteries from deep inside the federal […]
  • WSJ: Russian anti-virus software used to lift NSA info
    October 6, 2017
    Suddenly the curious Kaspersky case looks a little […]
  • Oregon governor’s race up for grabs?
    October 17, 2018
    Could the nation’s only openly bisexual governor […]
  • More Rudy: Mueller has a conflict of interest — but I can’t tell you what it is
    July 30, 2018
    Even by 2018 standards of political gaslighting, which […]
  • AfD: Germany’s ‘False Messiah’
    September 15, 2017
    A German reader — an Evangelical physician and […]
  • Trump Nominee Has History of Suing Colleges Over Israel Boycotts
    December 12, 2017
    Kenneth Marcus (You Tube) On Wednesday, the Senate […]
  • Today’s important controversy: “The Simpsons” thinks criticism of Apu is “politically correct”
    April 9, 2018
    If the wider public knew how much nonsense the […]
  • Bless Jeff Sessions’ Heart, He’s Right
    July 31, 2018
    Have you been watching the progressive freak-out over […]
  • Trump’s Rush to Judgment on Syria Chemical Attack
    April 10, 2018
    President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Defense […]
Copyright © 2019 TakingOnIssues.com

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us