Taking On Issues - Political Issues and Government Policies

A Hot Discussion Forum on Government Policies and Political Issues

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Election 2016
  • Big Government
  • Healthcare
  • The Other Side
  • What’s New
  • Your Freedom

We hear Julian Assange is ‘seriously’ considering coming to testify before the Senate

August 10, 2018 By Takingonissues

Much of the ongoing debate about Wikileaks founder Julian Assange being kicked out of the Ecuadorean embassy in London has centered on whether he could somehow avoid being taken into U.S. custody once his legal woes with the Brits were sorted out. The second question I’ve posed since we heard he would be leaving was whether or not the White House even wanted to deal with the hassle of bringing him here. But now there’s a new twist to the story. Could Assange be planning to come to America voluntarily?

There were some rumors about this earlier in the week but they seemed too unlikely to bring up here. Now, however, there’s at least partial confirmation that the story might be true. Wikileaks is claiming that the Senate Select Intelligence Committee has invited Assange to testify before them without specifying a time or location. And Assange is supposedly giving the proposal serious consideration, assuming he gets something in return. (NPR)

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is “seriously considering” a request to testify in person before the U.S. Senate intelligence committee about Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, according to a statement from his lawyer.

Assange has been holed up at Ecuador’s embassy in London since 2012, in part over fears that he could be extradited to the U.S. and potentially face trial over leaking massive troves of documents.

On Wednesday, the WikiLeaks Twitter account posted a letter that it says was delivered to Assange via the U.S. embassy in London. The purported document is signed by committee Chairman Richard Burr and Vice Chairman Mark Warner and asks that Assange “make yourself available for a closed interview with bipartisan Committee staff at a mutually agreeable time and location” as part of the probe.

You can read the letter yourself. It looks official enough and the committee members aren’t denying it. (Though they’re not confirming it, either.)

BREAKING: US Senate Intelligence Committee calls editor @JulianAssange to testify. Letter delivered via US embassy in London. WikiLeaks’ legal team say they are “considering the offer but testimony must conform to a high ethical standard”. Also: https://t.co/pPf0GTjTlp pic.twitter.com/TrDKkCKVBx

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) August 8, 2018

If this offer is authentic it would have some wide-ranging implications on a number of nagging issues. It’s coming from the two senior members of the Intelligence Committee representing both parties. What would they want to talk to Assange about now? We’ve been interested in possibly arresting him over the publications of the massive trove of military intelligence files he got from Chelsea (then Bradley) Manning, but I seriously doubt he’s interested in coming to America to discuss that. Would they want him to talk about where Wikileaks got the hacked DNC emails from the 2016 election as part of the Russia probe? That’s the more likely answer.

But to get him to voluntarily fly to Washington (assuming that’s where it would happen), he’d probably be demanding complete immunity and a promise that he wouldn’t be taken into custody for any reason. That’s a big ask and if the U.S. is even considering offering it they must think he’s got some seriously interesting stories to tell. Of course, since the letter specified “a mutually agreeable time and location,” they might even be considering traveling to England to talk to him. Wouldn’t that make for some intriguing news cycles?

So could this really be how the Julian Assange saga ends after all these years? He signs an agreement, gives a bit of testimony and rides off into the sunset, returning to the helm of Wikileaks and suffering no consequences? It hardly seems possible, but then again it’s 2018. The boundaries of possibility have been stretched rather thin.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Email, RSS Follow

Related

Subscribe to Taking on Issues

Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Political News

  • California's gun seizure program hits hurdles February 18, 2019
  • Politicians who jumped on Jussie Smollett attack claim in awkward spot February 18, 2019
  • North Carolina starts hearing on ballot fraud allegation in contested House race February 18, 2019
  • Poll: Independents Trust Mueller February 18, 2019
  • Autopsy of a Dead Coup February 18, 2019
  • Investigating the President of the United States February 18, 2019
  • Andrew McCabe Should Be On Trial, Not a Book Tour February 18, 2019
  • Jussie Smollett: Bearing False Witness February 18, 2019
  • Don't Expect Apologies Over the Smollett Race Hoax February 18, 2019

Archives

New Featured Articles

  • So much for those new drone registration rules I guess
    May 20, 2017

    posted at 2:31 pm on May 20, 2017 by Jazz Shaw If we wind the clock back to December of 2015 I was already talking about the new registration requirements which the Federal Aviation Administration was placing on civilian use of drones. The new rules had plenty of people upset for good reason. They seemed […]

    Email, RSS Follow
    […]
  • Debbie Wasserman Schultz warns police chief of ‘consequences’ for refusing to return her laptop
    May 25, 2017
    posted at 1:21 pm on May 25, 2017 by John Sexton […]
  • Annals Of Trumpian Populism
    September 13, 2017
    If this is right-wing populism, you can stick it where […]
  • Report: DNC drops partnership with Women’s March as co-chair Carmen Perez admits fault
    January 15, 2019
    The Jewish News Syndicate is reporting this morning […]
  • Liberals worry that digital assistants are being sexually harassed
    February 28, 2017
    posted at 4:01 pm on February 28, 2017 by Jazz Shaw By […]
  • Ecuador: Yes, we cut off Julian Assange’s internet access
    October 18, 2016
    posted at 10:31 pm on October 18, 2016 by John Sexton […]
  • Designating the IRGC as Terrorists Is a Dangerous Mistake
    October 11, 2017
    Hooman Majd explains why Trump’s expected […]
  • Poland Survived Nazism & Communism…
    July 7, 2017
    From David Goldman (Spengler): Now for the bad news: […]
  • Chicago’s gang violence problems credited to… the police
    May 9, 2017
    posted at 10:41 am on May 9, 2017 by Jazz Shaw As […]
  • All in: Mike Bloomberg to dump $80 million to try to buy the House for Democrats
    June 20, 2018
    Bad day for the infant-jail party. Good day for the […]
  • Walmart offers to send a stranger to your house to stock your fridge when you’re not home
    September 25, 2017
    From the strange but true files. Retailers are in a […]
  • DNC reveals their future victory plans including… reparations (of course)
    April 22, 2018
    Talk about counting your chickens before they’ve […]
  • Sen. Lindsay Graham is ready to go nuclear (and here’s why the GOP should do it)
    March 23, 2017
    posted at 7:21 pm on March 23, 2017 by John Sexton […]
  • Who leaked Trump’s off-the-record comments about “insulting” Canada to the Toronto Star?
    August 31, 2018
    I should note upfront that he didn’t actually […]
  • Jamie Lee Curtis: Halloween is about a traumatized woman taking back power (with help from lots of guns)
    October 10, 2018
    Okay, let me state up front that this is a dumb […]
Copyright © 2019 TakingOnIssues.com

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us