Taking On Issues - Political Issues and Government Policies

A Hot Discussion Forum on Government Policies and Political Issues

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Election 2016
  • Big Government
  • Healthcare
  • The Other Side
  • What’s New
  • Your Freedom

The Saudi-Canada Clash: A Values War

August 9, 2018 By Takingonissues

Is it any of Canada’s business whether Saudi women have the right to drive?

Well, Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland just made it her business.

Repeatedly denouncing Riyadh’s arrest of women’s rights advocate Samar Badawi, Freeland has driven the two countries close to a break in diplomatic relations.

“Reprehensible” said Riyadh of Freeland’s tweeted attack. Canada is “engaged in blatant interference in the Kingdom’s domestic affairs.”

The Saudis responded by expelling Canada’s ambassador and ordering 15,000 Saudi students to end their studies in Canada and barred imports of Canadian wheat. A $15 billion contract to provide armored vehicles to Saudi Arabia may be in jeopardy.

Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, who has been backsliding on his promises to modernize the kingdom, appears to have had enough of Western lectures on democratic values and morality.

A week after Pope Francis denounced the death penalty as always “impermissible,” Riyadh went ahead and crucified a convicted murderer in Mecca. In Saudi Arabia, homosexuality can get you a death sentence.

Neither President Donald Trump nor the State Department has taken sides, but The Washington Post has weighed in with an editorial: “Human Rights Are Everyone’s Business.”

“What Ms. Freeland and Canada correctly understand is that human rights … are universal values, not the property of kings and dictators to arbitrarily grant and remove on a whim. Saudi Arabia’s long-standing practice of denying basic rights to citizens, especially women—and its particularly cruel treatment of some dissidents—such as the public lashes meted out to (Ms. Badawi’s brother)—are matters of legitimate concern to all democracies and free societies.

“It is the traditional role of the United States to defend universal values everywhere they are trampled upon and to show bullying autocrats they cannot get away with hiding their dirty work behind closed doors.”

The Post called on the foreign ministers of all Group of Seven nations to retweet Freeland’s post saying, “Basic rights are everybody’s business.”

But these sweeping assertions raise not a few questions.

Who determines what are “basic rights” or “universal values”?

Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy that has never permitted women to drive and has always whipped criminals and had a death penalty.

When did these practices first begin to contradict “universal values”?

When did it become America’s “traditional role” to defend women’s right to drive automobiles in every country, when women had no right to vote in America until after World War I?

In the America of the 1950s, homosexuality and abortion were regarded as shameful offenses and serious crimes. Now abortion and homosexuality have been declared constitutional rights.

Are they basic human rights? To whom? Do 55 million abortions in the U.S. in 45 years not raise an issue of human rights?

Has it become the moral duty of the U.S. government to champion abortion and LGBT rights worldwide, when a goodly slice of America still regards them as marks of national decadence and decline?

And if the Saudis are reactionaries whom we should join Canada in condemning, why are we dreaming up an “Arab NATO” in which Saudi Arabia would be a treaty ally alongside whom we would fight Iran?

Iran, at least, holds quadrennial elections, and Iranian women seem less restricted and anti-regime demonstrations more tolerated than they are in Saudi Arabia.

Consider our own history.

From 1865 to 1965, segregation was the law in the American South. Did those denials of civil and political rights justify foreign intervention in the internal affairs of the United States?

How would President Eisenhower, who used troops to integrate Little Rock High, have responded to the British and French demanding that America end segregation now?

In a newly de-Christianized America, all religions are to be treated equally and none may be taught in any public school.

In nearly 50 nations, however, Muslims are the majority, and they believe there is but one God, Allah, and Muhammad is his prophet, and all other religions are false. Do Muslims have no right to insist upon the primacy of their faith in the nations they rule?

Is Western interference with this claim not a formula for endless conflict?

In America, free speech and freedom of the press are guaranteed. And these First Amendment rights protect libel, slander, filthy language, blasphemy, pornography, flag burning and published attacks on religious beliefs, our country itself, and the government of the United States.

If other nations reject such freedoms as suicidal stupidity, do we have some obligation to intervene in their internal affairs to promote them?

Recently, The Independent reported:

“Since last year, hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of innocent Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in the Xinjiang region in northwest China have been unjustly arrested and imprisoned in what the Chinese government calls ‘political re-education camps.’ Thousands have disappeared. There are credible reports of torture and death among the prisoners. … The international community has largely reacted with silence.”

Anyone up for sanctioning Xi Jinping’s China?

Or do Uighurs’ rights rank below those of Saudi feminists?

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of the recent book, Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Email, RSS Follow

Related

Subscribe to Taking on Issues

Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Political News

  • California's gun seizure program hits hurdles February 18, 2019
  • Politicians who jumped on Jussie Smollett attack claim in awkward spot February 18, 2019
  • North Carolina starts hearing on ballot fraud allegation in contested House race February 18, 2019
  • Poll: Independents Trust Mueller February 18, 2019
  • Autopsy of a Dead Coup February 18, 2019
  • Investigating the President of the United States February 18, 2019
  • Andrew McCabe Should Be On Trial, Not a Book Tour February 18, 2019
  • Jussie Smollett: Bearing False Witness February 18, 2019
  • Don't Expect Apologies Over the Smollett Race Hoax February 18, 2019

Archives

New Featured Articles

  • Pro-life progressives? Why not
    June 18, 2017

    Amid calls for accepting pro-life liberals, the Democratic Party faces a summer of soul-searching that will determine what room the party has, if any, for progressives who value unborn human life and set the table for the 2018 midterms. Beginning shortly after President Trump’s surprise victory, pro-life progressives began calling on the party to moderate […]

    Email, RSS Follow
    […]
  • Michigan board deadlocks, recount on … for now
    December 2, 2016
    posted at 2:41 pm on December 2, 2016 by Ed Morrissey […]
  • The Religious Liberty Front Line Today
    February 3, 2017
    We cannot sanction racism, sexism, homophobia and […]
  • Police arrest 8 at ‘Occupy ICE’ camp in Portland
    June 28, 2018
    A group calling itself Occupy ICE has been camped out […]
  • Wisconsin Governor Is Fighting Radical Left
    March 9, 2011
    Public Sector Unions Show True Colors Unions Really […]
  • Given the Trump economy, consumers turn optimistic about their holiday spending
    October 26, 2018
    For some strange reason — could it be the […]
  • Never mind why, just Like this post ASAP
    February 21, 2018
    Exercise your power and influence. ‘Like’ […]
  • Trump: I’ve got a feeling my “globalist” friend Gary Cohn will be back
    March 8, 2018
    It’s never going to stop being weird that high […]
  • When Forensic Evidence Goes Bad
    August 28, 2018
    Editor’s note: This is the sixth in a […]
  • Can breakfast save your life?
    January 29, 2019
    I am an egg fanatic. I eat them for breakfast at least […]
  • WSJ to Trump: Do the prudent thing and liquidate your business holdings
    November 18, 2016
    posted at 6:41 pm on November 18, 2016 by Allahpundit […]
  • Kremlin: We’ve scheduled a summit with Trump
    June 27, 2018
    When and where? So far we don’t know either, but […]
  • All in: Mike Bloomberg to dump $80 million to try to buy the House for Democrats
    June 20, 2018
    Bad day for the infant-jail party. Good day for the […]
  • Disney to Guardians cast: James Gunn is moot?
    August 2, 2018
    The cast of the Marvel Universe’s Guardians […]
  • Is the GOP Staring at Another 1930?
    March 15, 2018
    After Donald Trump’s victory in 2016, the GOP […]
Copyright © 2019 TakingOnIssues.com

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us