Taking On Issues - Political Issues and Government Policies

A Hot Discussion Forum on Government Policies and Political Issues

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Election 2016
  • Big Government
  • Healthcare
  • The Other Side
  • What’s New
  • Your Freedom

Report found evidence of discrimination at Evergreen College…against a white male professor

June 5, 2018 By Takingonissues

This is a very interesting story about a little-discussed issue that took place at Evergreen College last year. Two professors, one a white male and the other a Hispanic woman, were investigated after filing complaints against one another. The school hired a Seattle law firm to investigate and the firm concluded that while there was no evidence the white man discriminated against the Hispanic woman, there was evidence that the Hispanic woman had violated the school’s non-discrimination policy with regard to the white professor. This story is not easy to summarize but I’ll do my best using the hour-long video by Evergreen grad Benjamin Boyce (below) as a guide. I do recommend Boyce’s entire video if you have the time.

Professor Jon Baumunk teaches business and accounting at Evergreen State College. Last year he received an annual review which he took issue with. The review was mostly positive toward him and his teaching but at one point his supervisor mentioned his race (he’s white) and wondered aloud if students of color in his class felt free to speak up in his class. Baumunk asked the university to revise his review and remove the reference to his race on the grounds that it’s a protected characteristic and not something that belongs in a performance review. At the same time Baumunk, who is a member of the union at Evergreen, filed a grievance asking that the union support him.

Evergreen State College agreed with Baumunk and agreed to revise the review and remove the language and acknowledged that the race or sex of a professor is never mentioned in performance reviews, but the school seems to have taken its time correcting the review. Meanwhile, the union decided that it would not back Baumunk’s proposed grievance against the school because his review was seen as largely positive and so the reference to his race was deemed immaterial.

In March of last year, Baumunk went to the office of the president of his union, Grace Huerta, and asked why the union wasn’t supporting him. At this point, the stories diverge. Baumunk says he spoke to Huerta for five minutes and that she almost immediately became very defensive. Huerta claims Baumunk cornered her and spoke for 20 minutes, making her worry about missing a meeting. Both parties agreed the exchange had been unpleasant and agreed not to speak to one another again.

That changed on May 24th when Baumunk and Huerta had another interaction in the office of President George Bridges. The incident came in the midst of the student takeover of Bridges office which occurred that day. During that incident, Baumunk spent 2 1/2 minutes defending himself to the students. Huerta then spoke up and said she didn’t take his claims seriously because he had confronted her, a minority faculty member, at her office back in March. “As a faculty member of color, you personally addressed and challenged me at my office door saying why didn’t we as a union protect you when we did our best to protect you and address your concerns. And yet you come to a faculty member of color and charge her for not protecting your needs. So I refuse to listen to you grandstand and co-op this student meeting.”

In response to this, Baumunk took one small step forward, pointed at Huerta and said…something. It’s not clearly audible on the recording because students are talking over him. I do hear him say, “Grace, I want to tell you something…” but that’s all I can make out. As the students reacted, Baumunk stepped back and put his hands in his pockets. But it was too late. Students in the room demanded he leave and at least one demand he be fired (shades of the mob that showed up at Prof. Bret Weinstein’s class demanding he resign).

Subsequently, Baumunk was called out at a large student meeting where he was described as lunging and charging at Huerta (which didn’t happen). A student asked him to stand up and said he would be held accountable for his aggressive, privileged behavior. I have this clip queued up to a video showing the exchange between Baumunk and Huerta and the harassment of Baumunk that followed at the student meeting. It’s about 3-4 minutes long. Baumunk is the guy in the red shirt. You can stop watching around 8:30:

[embedded content]

So, as mentioned above, after this incident, a Seattle law firm was hired to investigate the competing claims. And what the firm found, in a report which has been buried by the school, is that Baumunk’s approach to Huerta in March was reasonable and based on her position (as the head of the union) not her protected status as a Hispanic woman. That’s a win for Baumunk.

As for the May interaction seen in the video, the report concluded that Baumunk did not direct his comments toward Huerta or raise any of her protected characteristics when speaking. He did point at her (just as she had waived a piece of paper at him) but certainly never lunged or charged at anyone.

However, Huerta’s comments to Baumunk did relate to his (and her own) protected characteristics in a way that is at odds with Evergreen State College’s non-discrimination policy “as well as a significant body of legal precedent.” In short, Huerta violated the rules and diminished Baumunk in front of students based on legally protected characteristics. Baumunk did not do the same to Huerta.

You could argue that since Evergreen brought in the law firm it made an effort to handle this responsibly. Except that doesn’t explain why Baumunk had his race brought up in the first place or why he was falsely accused in a meeting full of students while President George Bridges (who was standing directly behind Baumunk in the office) said nothing and applauded as Baumunk was falsely accused. Baumunk’s reputation may be cleared, belatedly, by the report but there should never have been a need for a report in the first place. Why can’t the school most sensitive to singling people out based on race avoid doing so with its own professor?

Here’s Boyce actually reading the conclusion of the report. Stick with this for at least 3-4 minutes where he points out that the evidence of a systemic racial problem at Evergreen is the one punishing white professors like Jon Baumunk and Bret Weinstein for asking that the same non-discrimination rules that protect everyone also be applied to them.

[embedded content]

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Email, RSS Follow

Related

Subscribe to Taking on Issues

Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Political News

  • How Climate Will Change in Cities Across the U.S. February 15, 2019
  • Trump Installed a Giant Golf Simulator Inside the White House February 15, 2019
  • Trump Declares National Emergency for Wall February 15, 2019
  • Judge Orders Alex Jones to Give Deposition in Sandy Hook Case February 15, 2019
  • Zillow's Algorithm Wants to Flip Your House February 15, 2019
  • There Is No National Emergency February 15, 2019
  • Trump on Solid Legal Ground in Declaring Emergency February 15, 2019
  • A Desperate Act of a Desperate Man February 15, 2019
  • A Revealing Two Weeks for Democrats February 15, 2019

Archives

New Featured Articles

  • The Village Voice Goes Silent, Finally
    September 10, 2018

    How do you write an obituary for someone who was a great and loving role model to the parents you love, but who was abusive and dismissive to you and your friends? When I first heard about the death of the Village Voice on August 31 (its print edition was euthanized last year, which had […]

    Email, RSS Follow
    […]
  • Mr. Trump, He Crazy
    January 4, 2018
    As John Podhoretz points out, you can’t always […]
  • Video: Andrew Napolitano returns to Fox — and doubles down on claim that GCHQ gave Obama intel on Trump
    March 29, 2017
    posted at 6:41 pm on March 29, 2017 by Allahpundit […]
  • The Disgraceful ‘Anti-Boycott Act’
    July 19, 2017
    Ryan Grim reports on a horrible piece of legislation: […]
  • Yemen’s Horrifying Cholera Epidemic Continues to Spread
    July 28, 2017
    IRIN Photos/Flickr: The UN-administered camp at […]
  • Fluoride in the water is ‘compulsory mass medication and a breach of human rights’
    August 1, 2018
    The American people are victims of chemical warfare. […]
  • America, A Nation Of Polemophiles
    April 11, 2017
    Good morning, America: North Korea is looking for […]
  • Oops! Network “Chief Political Analyst” inadvertently promotes GOP governing principle
    December 2, 2017
    As Allahpundit wrote about, ABC News had a very bad […]
  • Russian spy hired by Secret Service, worked at U.S. embassy in Moscow
    August 4, 2018
    Holy foreign spy intrigue, Batman! What if I told you […]
  • Great news: Luther Strange might stick around a few days longer; Moore: The exit polls say I won
    December 28, 2017
    Eh … probably not. When Alabama certifies the […]
  • An Uber-Hawk Flies High Again in Trump’s Washington
    August 2, 2018
    The spring of 2016 in Washington, D.C. was unusually […]
  • Atlantic: Why the recent Antifa protests are crossing the line
    November 16, 2018
    Peter Beinart has an interesting piece at the Atlantic […]
  • Is Mueller’s office now investigating … Stormygate?
    March 5, 2018
    Nonsense. When has a special prosecutor investigating […]
  • NFL divisional playoffs round 2 open thread
    January 15, 2017
    posted at 3:31 pm on January 15, 2017 by Jazz Shaw […]
  • Today’s the day: Electors to put an end to 2016
    December 19, 2016
    posted at 8:41 am on December 19, 2016 by Ed Morrissey […]
Copyright © 2019 TakingOnIssues.com

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us