Taking On Issues - Political Issues and Government Policies

A Hot Discussion Forum on Government Policies and Political Issues

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Election 2016
  • Big Government
  • Healthcare
  • The Other Side
  • What’s New
  • Your Freedom
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

On the Texas border, the feds are examining properties for you-know-what

July 9, 2018 By Takingonissues

Most of the discussion of the proposed border wall focuses on the 10,000 foot, federal level questions surrounding it. Will Congress approve the program? How much will the whole thing cost and how will it be paid for? (You lose three points in the quiz if you just shouted “Mexico!” at your screen.) But assuming we’re moving forward, there are other complications which crop up at the granular level. Every stretch of the border on the American side consists of land that belongs to somebody. Portions are state or federal land and parks. Others are municipal properties or even privately owned. Each and every one needs to be sorted out before the first bulldozers arrive.

It sounds as if Uncle Sam is planning ahead. The Washington Times reports that people along the Texas border have been getting some odd requests in the mail, asking for appointments to “survey” the border property and possibly chat with them about it. What do you suppose that could mean?

More property owners along the U.S.-Mexico border in South Texas say they’ve received notices from the federal government asking to review their land, which could be used for border wall construction.

KENS-TV reports residents in the town of Escobares received letters from the Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Customs and Border Protection a few weeks ago to get their consent to survey their land.

Rio Grande City School District board president Daniel Garcia says the district got a letter in May about district property that’s being considered for “tactical infrastructure, such as a border wall.”

If you do some digging around, the local press outlets in a few of these towns are offering more details. One such example comes from the town of Escobares, Texas. Residents there have been getting these notices mailed to them and reactions are clearly varied. Some see an opportunity to unload troublesome property or help out the government while others are taking a dim view. (KENS-TV)

KENS-TV reported residents in the town of Escobares, including Mayor Noel Escobar, received letters from the Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Customs and Border Protection a few weeks ago to get their consent to survey their land.

“I walk out the back door and what I’m going to see is a 30-foot fence,” Escobar said…

Roma resident Felix Rodriguez said he was visited by a government employee surveying his land earlier this year, offering $300 for a portion of his 500-square-foot property. He wants at least $1,500.

While I couldn’t verify it, I suspect that there must have been a typo in the report from Felix Rodriguez. He owns a 500-square-foot property on the Mexican border? Could you even put a trailer on a piece of land that size? That works out to less than 40×40, or maybe 20×80 if it’s just a strip of undeveloped land. But his counteroffer of $1,500 vs the government’s offer of $300 is probably typical of what we’ll have to deal with all along the border. People will always try to snag as much as they can in a government deal like this, but there have to be limits or the price quickly surges beyond practicality.

If deals can’t be struck, then we may wind up with undesirable cases of eminent domain, which conservatives should shy away from where possible in the post-Kelo era. Either way, none of this is going to be pretty and the media will be ready and waiting with stories of homeowners “unfairly evicted from their lands, all in the name of Trump’s wall.” What a mess.

The other complaints will likely be of the NIMBY style, such as was brought up by Major Escobar in the linked article. He’s upset that he’s going to walk out his back door and, “see a 30-foot fence.” Well, Mr. Mayor, you do realize that you live on the border, right? Isn’t there some sort of a fence there already? If not, are you simply allowing a stream of illegal aliens to traipse across your property every night?

Complications aside, I suppose it’s good to see that the government is doing the legwork to prepare for more wall construction. But it’s going to be a hot mess in political terms no matter how well we do on the funding.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Email, RSS Follow

Related

Subscribe to Taking on Issues

Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Political News

  • North Korea Calls Trump 'Erratic Old Man' December 9, 2019
  • Impeachment tensions flare: Dem counsel says Trump abused power, as GOP rips ‘rubber stamp’ hearing December 9, 2019
  • Live: Impeachment Hearing December 9, 2019
  • Supreme Court leaves Kentucky ultrasound law in place December 9, 2019
  • Biden blames staff, says nobody ‘warned’ him son’s Ukraine job could raise conflict December 9, 2019
  • I Cover Financial Crime. Here's How I Got Held Up Without a Gun December 9, 2019
  • AI Could Transform Medicine. Should We Let It? December 9, 2019
  • Brexit & Trump: Democracies Should Honor the People's Vote December 9, 2019
  • Pensacola Shooting Requires Rethinking These Policies December 9, 2019

Archives

New Featured Articles

  • Beyond ‘higher oil’ hype
    December 14, 2016

    Recently The Kingdom (aka Saudi Arabia), its fellow members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and some non-OPEC members made headlines with a deal to cut production of oil in coming months. No sooner was the deal hammered out than oil prices took off. But there is always more at play than […]

    Email, RSS Follow
  • Truscum, Tucutes, and Kelpselves
    July 11, 2018
    Progressivism’s chosen people […]
  • We Have Always Subsidized Suburbia
    October 19, 2017
    What image springs to mind when you picture […]
  • Defamation trial begins over Rolling Stone’s ‘a rape on campus’
    October 17, 2016
    posted at 5:01 pm on October 17, 2016 by John Sexton […]
  • Mexico to send National Guard to southern border
    June 9, 2019
    Mexico is going to send its National Guard to their […]
  • Poll: 62% now say it’s the federal government’s responsibility to make sure everyone has health coverage
    July 21, 2017
    The two parties will continue to battle over […]
  • Censors Out For Harambe
    September 6, 2016
    If I told you that two white college dorm RAs had […]
  • The Sanctions Addicts Look For Their Next Fix
    October 14, 2019
    The Trump administration is preparing to wage yet […]
  • The top 5 foods that lower blood pressure
    August 6, 2019
    High blood pressure increases your risk of everything […]
  • Sunday reflection: Matthew 5:1-12
    January 29, 2017
    posted at 11:31 am on January 29, 2017 by Ed Morrissey […]
  • Cut your risk of heart attack and stroke in 10 minutes a day
    September 10, 2019
    It’s no secret that our risk of heart problems […]
  • Cardinal Newman’s Roses
    July 11, 2019
    This is a lovely story about the woman and child whose […]
  • The Art of the Deal requires two parties who actually want a deal
    January 21, 2019
    Now that the halfway point of Donald Trump’s […]
  • Fire The Messenger
    January 25, 2012
    Mr. Obama|Our Teleprompter President     […]
  • NATO positions to aggravate Russia
    December 15, 2017
    The U.S. and its NATO allies are claiming that Russia […]
Copyright © 2019 TakingOnIssues.com

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us