Taking On Issues - Political Issues and Government Policies

A Hot Discussion Forum on Government Policies and Political Issues

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Election 2016
  • Big Government
  • Healthcare
  • The Other Side
  • What’s New
  • Your Freedom
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Mission irrelevant: Left presses Schumer for zero votes on SCOTUS nominee

July 6, 2018 By Takingonissues

Can Chuck Schumer keep 49 Democrats opposed to Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee regardless of who it is? That’s the mission liberal groups have given the man who helped put them in position for irrelevance in the next few weeks. Activists believe that they can more successfully target two Senate Republicans if no Democrats cross over to vote for confirmation, but that’s getting the issue backwards:

Under particular pressure to side with the president are the three red-state Democrats who voted for Justice Neil Gorsuch last year and face difficult reelection campaigns: Sens. Joe Manchin, Heidi Heitkamp, and Joe Donnelly.

Keeping them in the Democratic fold — in the face of withering pressure from a liberal base that expects nothing less — amounts to the biggest challenge of Schumer’s 18-month tenure as Democratic leader. The New Yorker has preferred to take a hands-off approach to his moderate members, rather than twisting arms on big votes. Yet it’s far from clear that will work this time.

“The message from grassroots groups is pretty clear: that if Democratic leadership can keep their caucus unified in doing no harm, we can aim our firepower on Republicans like Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski and bring full pressure to bear in their states,” Adam Green, co-founder of the activist Progressive Change Campaign Committee, said in an interview.

Green added that any red-state Democrats who “start leaving the reservation and actively march in another direction” on Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, “that by necessity will take energy away from pressuring Republicans.”

Interesting plan. There are only two flaws in it — Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer. Harry Reid broke Senate precedent in late 2013 by changing the rules mid-session on a majority-only vote to eliminate the filibuster on presidential nominations with the Supreme Court as the only exception. When Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to replace Antonin Scalia, these same liberal groups baited Schumer into filibustering him, prompting Mitch McConnell to return the favor and change the rules to remove the filibuster on all presidential appointments.

Had Schumer allowed an up-or-down vote at that time on Gorsuch, it’s almost certain that McConnell would lack the votes now to make that rule change, especially to fill Anthony Kennedy’s seat rather than Antonin Scalia’s. McConnell has effectively 50 votes, a bare majority, not the 52 he had in the beginning of the Trump presidency. It’s unlikely that Jeff Flake, for instance, would have voted for the rule change now, let alone Collins and Murkowski.

Now these activist groups essentially want to try the hair of the dog that bit them, but what’s the point? Trump’s nominee hasn’t even been selected yet, and his or her success will rise and fall on Republican unity, not Democratic unity, thanks in large part to their success in pressuring Schumer into his foolish strategy sixteen months ago. Even if Schumer holds all 49 Democrats, the nominee can still win confirmation with 50 Republicans.

This strategy doesn’t have zero downside either. Democrats need to hold as many of those red-state seats as they can in the midterms, lest the next Supreme Court nomination be decided by 55 or 56 Republicans instead of 50. This strategy basically burns down any chance of Schumer limiting his losses by demanding no votes from colleagues representing states Trump easily won ahead of knowing who the nominee is. It’s precisely the kind of knee-jerk loyalty test to the Left that Republican challengers in those states will highlight to tell voters that they’re really voting for Schumer and Nancy Pelosi if they re-elect people like Joe Manchin and Claire McCaskill. That will have an impact not just on Senate races but on House races as well.

Far be it from me to point out to political opponents the ways in which they are shooting themselves in the foot, but this is the worst possible approach to take for a seat that still won’t shift the balance of the court more than nominally. Their radicalism and poisonous partisanship won’t do much to derail this nominee, but it sure might have something to do with greasing the skids for the next opening that might really matter to the Left.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Email, RSS Follow

Related

Subscribe to Taking on Issues

Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Political News

  • Illegal immigrants to be able to get driver’s licenses in NY after legal challenge fails December 14, 2019
  • Trump's Trade Trifecta December 14, 2019
  • 2019 British Election: A New Political Landscape December 14, 2019
  • Why Boris Johnson's Huge Win Has Big Echoes for America December 14, 2019
  • Lots of Lessons From Afghanistan--None Learned December 14, 2019
  • A Decisive Moment in the Battle for Brexit December 14, 2019
  • Et Tu, U.K.? December 14, 2019
  • Why Working Class Voters Deserted Labour en Masse December 14, 2019
  • Boris Johnson Is an Incredibly Lucky Politician December 14, 2019

Archives

New Featured Articles

  • Trump: Let’s face it, I’ve “brilliantly” used the tax laws
    October 3, 2016

    posted at 7:21 pm on October 3, 2016 by Allahpundit My expectation yesterday was that he’d spin the NYT story the same way he spun his corporate bankruptcies and his patronage of Democratic pols, treating his tax liability as yet another way that he’d exploited a system set up by, and for the benefit of, […]

    Email, RSS Follow
  • In Hungary, Orban’s anti-migrant policies win him a supermajority
    April 9, 2018
    In February, we previewed this year’s national […]
  • Don’t get stuck in the past
    March 5, 2017
    I was reading a recent article in Barron’s that […]
  • Let’s talk about that Danish submarine murder case for a moment
    October 7, 2017
    There’s been a new development in the case of […]
  • Alleged assault by CNN’s Don Lemon is corroborated by an eyewitness
    August 16, 2019
    Earlier this week a lawsuit was filed by a former […]
  • The miraculous Brexit deal… or not?
    October 17, 2019
    Just as I was getting coffee this morning, an excited […]
  • Insulin and disease
    August 18, 2017
    Want a real gem of health wisdom that few people have […]
  • The top 5 foods that lower blood pressure
    August 6, 2019
    High blood pressure increases your risk of everything […]
  • Medieval Ingenuity, a Gentleman Officer, and a Roman Mess
    April 29, 2019
    The sad but not unexpected news this morning is that […]
  • Sunday reflection: Luke 21:5-19
    November 13, 2016
    posted at 12:01 pm on November 13, 2016 by Ed […]
  • TAC Honors Jon Utley With Lifetime Achievement Award
    May 14, 2019
    After his father was executed in a Soviet prison camp, […]
  • Israel: Syrian fighter jet invaded our territory, and you can guess what happened next
    July 24, 2018
    The continuing convulsions in the Syrian civil war and […]
  • NBC poll: Dead heat on impeachment as party-line trenches harden
    October 25, 2019
    At first blush, the new NBC/Survey Monkey poll on […]
  • War: AOC endorses progressive primary challenge to centrist House Dem colleague
    September 17, 2019
    This was of mild interest until I saw the reaction […]
  • Gallup: Americans oppose Trump’s travel ban, 42/55 — or do they?
    February 2, 2017
    posted at 6:41 pm on February 2, 2017 by Allahpundit […]
Copyright © 2019 TakingOnIssues.com

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us