Taking On Issues - Political Issues and Government Policies

A Hot Discussion Forum on Government Policies and Political Issues

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Election 2016
  • Big Government
  • Healthcare
  • The Other Side
  • What’s New
  • Your Freedom
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

McConnell on Kavanaugh: Listen carefully and you can hear the sound of goalposts moving

October 1, 2018 By Takingonissues

There are good arguments for supporting the FBI probe. Either it’ll diminish the cloud of suspicion over Kavanaugh, which will bolster respect for the Court and for his own decisions as a member of it, or turn up evidence of serious wrongdoing and disqualify him from a seat he shouldn’t have. If nothing else, it reflects the belief that women who say they were victims of sexual assault deserve to have their claims taken seriously by law enforcement.

But there are bad arguments too. “It’ll satisfy Democrats” is a bad, bad argument. It’s so transparently false that Senate Republicans have begun mocking their Democratic colleagues in formal correspondence for their insincerity about it. Here’s Grassley responding to a demand from Bernie Sanders over the weekend that Kavanaugh be investigated for perjury now:

“As you know, on July 10, 2018, you stated ‘[w]e must mobilize the American people to defeat Judge Kavanaugh.’ This happened less than 24 hours after Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination was announced,” Grassley wrote. “As you also know, all Senators have had access to 307 judicial opinions Judge Kavanaugh wrote during his twelve years on the bench, over 500,000 pages of documents, over 40 hours of live testimony, and answers to more written questions than every prior Supreme Court nominee combined.”…

He sarcastically asked: “Am I to take from your letter that you are now undecided and willing to seriously engage with the Senate’s advice-and-consent constitutional duties related to the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh to serve as an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States? … If so, we should have a conversation about what information you need to assist you in making your decision, and I look forward to that conversation.”

Even Flake is under no illusions about what the investigation might achieve politically. Asked by the Atlantic what he hoped to accomplish by requesting the delay to let the FBI investigate, he gave two institutional reasons: Protecting the Court’s credibility and making a gesture of compromise in a Senate that desperately needs more of that ethic. He doesn’t expect any votes to change, although he did hold out hope for a bit of rhetorical comity at least, telling McKay Coppins, “My hope is that some Democrats will say,’Hey, we may not change our vote, but this process was worthy of the institution, and we feel satisfied.’” I’m verrrrrry curious to see if his buddy Chris Coons grants him that much. Flake is momentarily the left’s favorite Republican because he was willing to support a Democratic request amid tremendous pressure from his own party not to do so. The least Coons could do at the end of the week to repay his bipartisanship if the investigation turns up nothing new on Kavanaugh is to say that he feels better about the nominee and more assured of his innocence than he did a week ago.

Would Coons dare say that, though? His party has convinced itself of Kavanaugh’s absolute guilt in the short-term interest of defeating his nomination and the long-term interest of discrediting his votes as a member of the Court. Even a rhetorical concession might be a bridge too far. We’ll see.

In lieu of an exit question, read David French today on the quiet decline of the case against Kavanaugh. Rachel Mitchell’s memo raised several good points about inconsistencies in Ford’s memories; Swetnick’s credibility has been called into question by allegations about workplace behavior and no one in the media can find anyone to corroborate her rape-party claims; more Yale classmates have spoken up in defense of Kavanaugh to rebut the account of his drunken behavior offered by Deborah Ramirez. The first half of McConnell’s speech here (watch it if you have time) also makes a compelling case that the various Democrats surrounding Ford, both in the Senate and among her own lawyers, seem to have done everything they could to produce the type of partisan Washington circus last week that she wanted to avoid. There hasn’t been much good faith here from the Good People. The FBI investigation is unlikely to produce a lot more, but we’ll see. Watch Coons.

The post McConnell on Kavanaugh: Listen carefully and you can hear the sound of goalposts moving appeared first on Hot Air.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Email, RSS Follow

Related

Subscribe to Taking on Issues

Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Political News

  • Report: Trump's Ukraine Extortion Scheme Was Financed by Russia December 15, 2019
  • Man Accused of Smacking Reporter's Rear on Live TV Is Charged December 15, 2019
  • Trump supporter grabs spotlight at Sanders rally with a message for the president December 15, 2019
  • Hallmark Pulls Commercial of Brides Kissing December 15, 2019
  • What's Changed Since Sandy Hook? December 15, 2019
  • Buttigieg releases list of campaign fundraisers after criticism from Warren December 14, 2019
  • Trump may be the Least Macho President December 14, 2019
  • Anti-impeachment Democrat Jeff Van Drew meets with Trump to discuss party switch December 14, 2019
  • Possible Bribery Charges in Investigation of Rudy's Friends December 14, 2019

Archives

New Featured Articles

  • Finally, something you like is also good for you
    July 5, 2018

    You knew it all along. Or wanted to. Now, we have grounds for a firm belief that coffee is not only good for you. It prolongs your life. Even if you down eight cups a day. It’s a habit. It tastes good. And it helps your heath. What’s not to like? So, go ahead, have […]

    Email, RSS Follow
  • Portland gets ready for another weekend of the far-right vs Antifa
    August 13, 2019
    This coming Saturday the 17th is the date a collection […]
  • Deep question from Morning Joe: Is Trump Barron’s father?
    September 13, 2019
    Hoo boy. By Monday if not earlier, someone will be […]
  • What does the $100 race really tell us?
    October 14, 2017
    Yesterday someone posted this video, or a version of […]
  • You’ve got a lot more than 30-50 feral hogs
    August 7, 2019
    Have you seen this new meme that’s been making […]
  • Ocasio-Cortez on immigration: Latinos are descendants of native Americans, therefore…
    February 7, 2019
    Therefore … what? Where’s she going with […]
  • NY Gov vetoes bill allowing lottery winners to remain anonymous
    December 10, 2018
    Back in February, I wrote about a woman in New […]
  • Why Many Christian Conservatives Support Roy Moore
    November 27, 2017
    Why would Christian conservatives in good conscience […]
  • Is daily aspirin therapy safe?
    July 30, 2019
    Allopathic medicine would like you to take it as […]
  • Tracing Chris Arnade’s Steps in America’s Inner Ring Suburbs
    September 17, 2019
    I recently reviewed photojournalist Chris […]
  • The Perils of Arming Ukraine
    October 11, 2017
    Rajan Menon and Will Ruger elaborate on why arming […]
  • EU to Trump: Repatriating terrorist citizens “not as easy” as you think
    February 18, 2019
    The deuce you say! After Donald Trump challenged […]
  • Oopsie: Hillary’s ground game might have ended up turning out … Trump voters
    November 11, 2016
    posted at 1:31 pm on November 11, 2016 by Allahpundit […]
  • 3 supplements that pull double duty for your joints and your heart
    September 3, 2019
    Every day, an estimated 30 million people worldwide […]
  • Downtown Los Angeles Is Coming Home—to the New Elite
    March 21, 2019
    In The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Jane […]
Copyright © 2019 TakingOnIssues.com

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us