Taking On Issues - Political Issues and Government Policies

A Hot Discussion Forum on Government Policies and Political Issues

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Election 2016
  • Big Government
  • Healthcare
  • The Other Side
  • What’s New
  • Your Freedom

Florida to ban a different sort of “gift” from lobbyists

November 11, 2017 By Takingonissues

It’s an interesting idea sure to draw accolades from any number of people, but is it really legal? Florida may be poised to find out. The question at hand has to do with the revolving door of elected officials, lobbyists and the questionable gifts which pass between them. (Generally just in one direction.) Cash is out of the question and expensive presents are supposed to be regulated as well. But what about sex?

According to Politico’s Playbook, the Sunshine State is considering a law which would ban lobbyists from engaging in sex with elected officials. The basis for this is the idea that sex can be used as a “gift” and influence the lawmaker’s decisions. Obviously sound in theory, but difficult to quantify in a bill, no? Let’s dig into it further.

Sex between legislators and lobbyists could soon become illegal under Florida’s gift ban. In the wake of back-to-back scandals rocking the Florida Senate, state Sen. Lauren Book said Monday she’s working with other legislators to draft legislation banning lawmaker-lobbyist sex and she’s trying to establish a panel and process to handle sexual harassment claims … Other lawmakers say they favor that idea as well her proposal to add “sexual coercion to Florida Statute 112.313 that bans lawmakers from accepting gifts. The current statute contemplates financial transactions, not sexual ones, although the Florida Supreme Court has recognized sex as a type of currency. In a 2004 ruling, the court upheld a guilty verdict against a Miami-Dade police officer convicted of accepting “unlawful compensation” for having sex with a 19-year-old woman in return for not arresting her for drunken driving.

This sounds like some seriously dubious legal ground here. Granted, one can see how the courts would agree that a police officer agreeing not to arrest someone in exchange for sexual favors would be seen as “compensation” (if not outright sexual assault and abuse of authority) so that could be banned. But lobbyists?

No matter how you cut it, adults are free to engage in their own personal relationships outside of work. If we start quantifying sex as a “gift” in one case there would be a massive can of worms to follow. This gets even tougher if the lobbyist in question isn’t offering a one time “gratuity” to the lawmaker but is in a long-term relationship with them. Over at Redstate they raise that question in terms of Congressman Bill Shuster of Pennsylvania. The head of the powerful Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (which provides oversight for the Federal Aviation Authority) has been dating an airline industry lobbyist for quite a while now.

Lobbyist-doinking by lawmakers is not confined to Florida. GOP Rep. Bill Shuster nearly lost his primary in 2016 over his own schlonging of a lobbyist employed by a trade association whose top lobbying priority Shuster conveniently has made a major push to enact, multiple years running. Shuster has stated that his lobbyist girlfriend does not lobby him.

It is not clear whether the proposed Florida ban, if enacted, will ultimately contain any carve-outs for the kind of situation apparently applicable to Shuster, in which the relationship is a consensual, long-term, non-extra-marital one.

So even if such a ban is enacted, where do they draw the line between “gifts” and legitimate relationships? Admittedly Shuster is one of the most outrageous examples given his committee assignment and the nature of his girlfriend’s job. But what if a Senator is dating a lobbyist from an industry they have almost nothing to do with?

I know the old saying about politics making strange bedfellows, but when we begin regulating literal bedfellows is just seems like we’re heading down a very troubling road. Of course, it would be a hoot to have the Supreme Court hear the challenge and review all the witness testimony.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Email, RSS Follow

Related

Subscribe to Taking on Issues

Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Political News

  • Comey memos: Trump said he 'needed' and 'expected' loyalty, wanted proof dossier was 'a lie' April 20, 2018
  • Two Gilchrist County Florida Deputies Killed in Apparent Ambush April 20, 2018
  • Illinois Dems push bill rewarding schools that replace armed officers with therapists April 20, 2018
  • DOJ turns over redacted Comey memos to congressional committees April 20, 2018
  • Trump says Comey threw McCabe 'under the bus' after criminal referral April 19, 2018
  • Federal court rules against Trump's sanctuary city crackdown efforts April 19, 2018
  • Texas School: List 'Postive Aspects' of Slavery April 19, 2018
  • Florida felons are latest point of contention in fight for battleground state's votes April 19, 2018
  • DOJ watchdog sends criminal referral for McCabe to federal prosecutor April 19, 2018

Archives

New Featured Articles

  • Steve Bannon: Firing Comey was the biggest mistake in modern political history
    September 11, 2017
    Bannon is prone to overstatement and this is no […]
  • Report: Justice Department told feds to “stand down” on Dakota Access Pipeline protests
    October 22, 2016
    posted at 5:31 pm on October 22, 2016 by Jazz Shaw A […]
  • Nikki Haley: If the UN doesn’t act against Assad for this chemical attack, we might
    April 5, 2017
    posted at 5:21 pm on April 5, 2017 by Allahpundit […]
  • Taxmageddon update: Surviving workers pleased with extra ‘crumbs’ in their paychecks
    February 1, 2018
    Two months ago Nancy Pelosi announced that the GOP tax […]
  • USA Today: Did you know you can add a chainsaw bayonet to an AR-15?
    November 8, 2017
    To cleanse the palate, I never wanted an AR-15 but now […]
  • Green card holder sentenced for imaginary voter fraud in Texas
    February 12, 2017
    posted at 12:31 pm on February 12, 2017 by Jazz Shaw […]
  • Our power grid remains open to both physical and cyber-attacks
    April 2, 2018
    Just in case you were feeling a little too cheerful, […]
  • Russia tests Trump, deploys ground-based cruise missiles in violation of arms treaty
    February 14, 2017
    posted at 10:31 pm on February 14, 2017 by Allahpundit […]
  • Why the Latest Gun Debate Already Sounds Stale
    October 11, 2017
    11 days after Stephen Paddock gunned down 59 people in […]
  • We need to know what’s in the health care bill before we pass it, says … Nancy Pelosi
    March 10, 2017
    posted at 8:01 pm on March 10, 2017 by Allahpundit […]
  • Pelosi: Time for the “icon” to hit the bricks; Update: Conyers’ attorney: What’s the difference between him and Franken? Update: Clyburn demands resignation
    November 30, 2017
    Better late than never? Just four days ago, Nancy […]
  • DC councilman: Hey, sorry for that whole “Jews control the weather to own the cities” thing
    March 19, 2018
    Trayon White wants you to know he’s sorry, at […]
  • 19 Americans who visited Cuba say they experienced the same mysterious symptoms as diplomats
    January 29, 2018
    Last September the State Department issued a travel […]
  • Rep. Rangel: Trump’s election is ‘a nightmare’
    November 17, 2016
    posted at 7:21 pm on November 17, 2016 by John Sexton […]
  • Army Corps Of Social Engineers
    July 5, 2017
    The US military will now pay for sex-change operations […]
Copyright © 2018 TakingOnIssues.com

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us