Taking On Issues - Political Issues and Government Policies

A Hot Discussion Forum on Government Policies and Political Issues

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Election 2016
  • Big Government
  • Healthcare
  • The Other Side
  • What’s New
  • Your Freedom
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

EPA: Fracking has contributed to drinking water contamination but overall risk uncertain

December 13, 2016 By Takingonissues

posted at 5:01 pm on December 13, 2016 by John Sexton

An EPA report which was six years in the making concludes there is evidence fracking has contributed to drinking water contamination in some specific cases but says there is not enough information to judge the widespread risk to ground water. Because the interim report, published in 2015, said there was no evidence of widespread contamination from fracking, the final report is being taken as a shift in the direction of environmentalists. From the New York Times:

The new version is far more worrying than the first, which found “no evidence that fracking systemically contaminates water” supplies. In a significant change, that conclusion was deleted from the final study.

“E.P.A scientists chose not to include that sentence. The scientists concluded it could not be quantitatively supported,” said Thomas A. Burke, the E.P.A.’s science adviser, and deputy assistant administrator of the agency’s Office of Research and Development…

Mr. Burke said that the new report found evidence that fracking has contributed to drinking water contamination in all stages of the process: acquiring water to be used for fracking, mixing the water with chemical additives to make fracking fluids, injecting the chemical fluids underground, collecting the wastewater that flows out of fracking wells after injections, and storing the used wastewater.

However, the Associated Press take on the report is that it doesn’t offer much else for environmentalists to cheer:

A new report issued Tuesday said fracking poses a risk to drinking water in some circumstances, but a lack of information precludes a definitive statement on how severe the risk is.

“Because of the significant data gaps and uncertainties in the available data, it was not possible to fully characterize the severity of impacts, nor was it possible to calculate or estimate the national frequency of impacts on drinking water resources” from fracking activities, the EPA said in a report that raises more questions than answers.

The NY Times reports that Burke, the EPA science adviser, refused to issue any policy recommendations because the report was “full of gaps and holes.” Meanwhile, the American Petroleum Institute issued a statement suggesting politics was at work in the decision and looking forward to the incoming Trump administration:

“It is beyond absurd for the administration to reverse course on its way out the door,” said API Upstream Director Erik Milito. “The agency has walked away from nearly a thousand sources of information from published papers, technical reports and peer reviewed scientific reports demonstrating that industry practices, industry trends, and regulatory programs protect water resources at every step of the hydraulic fracturing process. Decisions like this amplify the public’s frustrations with Washington.

“Fortunately, the science and data clearly demonstrate that hydraulic fracturing does not lead to widespread, systemic impacts to drinking water resources. Unfortunately, consumers have witnessed five years and millions of dollars expended only to see conclusion based in science changed to a conclusion based in political ambiguity. We look forward to working with the new administration in order to instill fact-based science back into the public policy process.”

This does seem like a win for the ‘leave it in the ground’ movement in the sense that they are no longer fighting against their opponents in the industry and an adverse conclusion by the federal government. Nevertheless, this does not appear to be a loss for those who support fracking. Given the stance of the incoming administration, no new regulation of fracking is likely to follow this report, nor should it given that it reached no definitive conclusion about risks. In any case, since most fracking takes place on state and private land, red states will continue to support it while blue states continue to oppose and, in some cases, ban it.

Related Posts:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Email, RSS Follow

Related

Subscribe to Taking on Issues

Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Political News

  • Greta Thunberg: Times Person of the Year December 12, 2019
  • The Welfare State 'Brezhnev Doctrine' December 12, 2019
  • Understanding the U.S. Economy: Lots of Rotten Jobs December 12, 2019
  • New York's Costly, Quixotic Crusade Against Exxon December 12, 2019
  • How States Are Leading on Climate Action December 12, 2019
  • Smug James Comey Should Cool His Celebratory Jets December 12, 2019
  • The Shamelessness of Bill Barr December 12, 2019
  • How Dems Risk Underminding Suburban Strategy in 2020 December 12, 2019
  • What Iowa Voters' Second-Choice Picks Can Tell Us December 12, 2019

Archives

New Featured Articles

  • Why John Brennan Doesn’t Deserve a Security Clearance
    August 19, 2018

    After President Donald Trump revoked his security clearance, John Brennan arose as a Hero of Free Speech. On Twitter, he announced in terms that reanimated the Founding Fathers and marched them down Constitution Avenue: “This action is part of a broader effort by Mr. Trump to suppress freedom of speech. My principles are worth far more […]

    Email, RSS Follow
  • War on the press: Media barred from townhall held by … Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
    August 17, 2018
    I’m surprised. Historically, when have […]
  • Lindsey Graham: If North Korea goes to the Olympics, I fully believe we won’t
    January 2, 2018
    What? Why the hell not? The regime’s been […]
  • Parkland shooting surveillance video finally released
    March 15, 2018
    The Broward County Sheriff’s Office has finally […]
  • Of course Elizabeth Warren loves Canada… and unions
    October 1, 2017
    As has been widely reported, President Trump is […]
  • Identifying the source of today’s growth
    May 30, 2017
    Now may be a good time to remember the global panic […]
  • The Saudis and Emiratis Are Destabilizing Another Country
    April 16, 2019
    The Washington Post criticizes the role of […]
  • AOC advisor lies his ass off about what the Green New Deal fact sheet on her website said
    February 9, 2019
    As a Twitter pal noted, this is yet another point of […]
  • In the Turk-Syrian-Kurd Dance, the U.S. Has Two Left Feet
    February 25, 2018
    It should be no surprise that Washington’s […]
  • As GOP leaders fail to deliver, Trump says it’s time to ‘let Obamacare fail’
    July 18, 2017
    Personal Liberty Poll Exercise your right to vote. […]
  • The Evangelical Rot Deepens
    October 17, 2019
    Paula White-Cain, telling viewers of the Jim Bakker […]
  • Virginia Roberts: Prince Andrew ‘knows exactly what he’s done’
    August 28, 2019
    Yesterday a judge in Manhattan held a hearing to allow […]
  • Whitehouse: I’ve cracked the calendar code to pinpoint Kavanaugh’s sexual assault
    September 28, 2018
    Has American political life become permanently […]
  • Left Brain/Right Brain
    January 27, 2018
    That’s an excerpt from a 99-cent Kindle article […]
  • Are we finally getting a federal animal cruelty law?
    October 24, 2019
    Animal cruelty laws vary from state to state, with […]
Copyright © 2019 TakingOnIssues.com

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us