A reader at the University of Michigan passed the document below on. It was sent out by the University of Michigan to employees of its Ann Arbor campus:
Dear Ann Arbor campus faculty and students,
The University of Michigan is committed to fostering an environment of inclusiveness. Consistent with this value, the University has created a process for students to designate pronouns with the University and have those pronouns reflected on class rosters this fall. A designated pronoun is a pronoun an individual chooses to identify with and expects others to use when referencing them (i.e., he, she, him, his, ze, etc.). Faculty members play a vital role in ensuring all of our community feels valued, respected and included.
Students can designate pronouns in Wolverine Access through the new Gender Identity tab within the Campus Personal Information section. This page will be used to enter/update and/or delete pronoun information with the University.
Designated Pronouns will automatically populate on all class rosters accessed through Wolverine Access. Rosters pulled from other systems will not have designated pronouns listed. If a student does not designate a pronoun, none will be listed for them. Given that this process is new, we ask that faculty review their rosters again in mid- to late October to give students time to designate their pronouns.
These changes give students the ability to tell the University what pronoun they identify with for use in our communications and interactions with them. Asking about and correctly using someone’s designated pronoun is one of the most basic ways to show your respect for their identity and to cultivate an environment that respects all gender identities. If you make a mistake and use the wrong pronoun, you can acknowledge that you made a mistake, and use the correct pronoun next time. Please help us continue to make the University of Michigan an inclusive and welcoming place for all of our students.
To learn more about how to designate pronouns, visit Wolverine Access at https://csprod.dsc.umich.edu/htmldoc/eng/dftie/lsaa/htm/cc_ss_genderid.html. If you have any questions about designated pronouns and to learn more about gender identity and gender expression, email the Spectrum Center at [email protected] or visit our website at spectrumcenter.umich.edu.
The reader added the following commentary, which I’ve edited very lightly out of an abundance of caution to protect the reader’s confidentiality, given the McCarthyism on campus these days:
It was only a matter of time before my institution imposed upon the faculty some sort of system that would compel us to use students’ pronouns of choice. Lo and/or behold. The email above was just now sent to the faculty by two high-ranking administrators (total 2015-16 salary $835,674.13). It informs us that students may now choose to designate a pronoun in their online personal file, which will be displayed on a faculty member’s online course roster. It would seem that professors and graduate student instructors are now obliged to familiarize themselves with any non-binary pronouns required by a student prior to the start of the semester.
Luckily for the students, they can report any and all cases of harassment to the Spectrum Center. I am unable to locate most of its staff members in a publicly available salary database; its director however, pulls down $81K, more than many faculty members. Since faculty are now given all the necessary pronoun information up front in our class rosters, we no longer have any excuse for slipping up and harassing/micro-aggressing/invalidating a student with the flagrant and violent use of an incorrect pronoun. But I’m fairly sure that such a thing will never happen because we’re all deathly afraid of losing our jobs over a discrimination lawsuit. I for one just bought a house and since I have no actual talents or skills I really need this job. “Ze”, huh? Well that’s just super!
Now, let’s set aside for the moment the fact that the (very few?) faculty members like myself who have not drunk heady draughts of the Kool-Aid are being compelled to assent to a brand new and extremely radical ideology they disagree with. Let’s also set aside the fact that when I am told to call a man a woman and vice versa, I am being forced to stare falsehood in the face and call it truth–and then celebrate that falsehood to the heavens (not that I don’t believe that there are men who desperately want to be women and vice versa; I know there are and they have my sympathy). Let’s further forget that something so trivial and childish as improper pronoun use (!!!) could cost me and my peers our jobs unless we were to make public apologies, recant our heathen ways, and embrace the One True Faith.
Again, let’s ignore all that vitally important stuff and think about dollars and cents. Once again, one of the two units I work in is compelled to trim its annual budget. By a tiny amount, I’ll freely admit: 1%. But it’s still a cut. And we have to cut that 1% every year. This means that our department never be able to make permanent one of our underpaid temporary employees who keeps a research center running. Without this individual’s tireless efforts our doors would be closed and our emails often unanswered. Everyone is asked to trim, to cut, to streamline, etc. But there is always more money to be found for a new Diversity and Inclusion Coordinator, usually someone who makes as much or more than an assistant professor. In short, if you need something to help you do the job for which you were hired, they plead poverty. But when the progressive left creates yet another radical identity category, some new and improved form of human personhood, they build and staff a center for it. Counting only individuals with the word “Diversity” or “Inclusion” either in their job title or the title of the unit for which they work, we spent $3,151,280 on salaries alone in 2015-16. The cost of whatever programs or initiatives these individuals and units were collectively responsible for is beyond my ability to calculate (I wouldn’t know where to look for such numbers). Sadly, the two other universities in our “family” spent only $140,347 on similar staff; surely they are nightmare hellscapes for the “diverse”.
Granted, $3 million is chump change for a place like this but darned if I couldn’t do wonders with it. But when my department needs money for something important and central to our job, I’m told to hustle a donor. Kind of insulting.
In the Middle Ages, even when a kingdom was poor, they built lavish cathedrals, because that’s what was most important to them. It’s what they worshiped. On campus today, administrator’s worship the great god Diversity, to whom fulsome tribute must be paid.
WORCESTER, Mass. — A freshman tentatively raises her hand and takes the microphone. “I’m really scared to ask this,” she begins. “When I, as a white female, listen to music that uses the N word, and I’m in the car, or, especially when I’m with all white friends, is it O.K. to sing along?”
The answer, from Sheree Marlowe, the new chief diversity officer at Clark University, is an unequivocal “no.”
The exchange was included in Ms. Marlowe’s presentation to recently arriving first-year students focusing on subtle “microaggressions,” part of a new campus vocabulary that also includes “safe spaces” and “trigger warnings.”
Good grief. When a student is not only afraid to sing along with a pop song, but is “really scared” even to ask if it’s okay, because even the question might seem blasphemous, we are in serious trouble. Who can possibly learn in a climate of such ideological fear? Say the wrong thing, and boom! you’re gone. More:
Among her other tips: Don’t ask an Asian student you don’t know for help on your math homework or randomly ask a black student if he plays basketball. Both questions make assumptions based on stereotypes. And don’t say “you guys.” It could be interpreted as leaving out women, said Ms. Marlowe, who realized it was offensive only when someone confronted her for saying it during a presentation.
Want to be extra-safe? Don’t talk to anyone not of your own race. The risk is too great. This is priceless:
Fresh on the minds of university officials are last year’s highly publicized episodes involving racist taunts at the University of Missouri — which appear to have contributed to a precipitous decline in enrollment there this fall.
“That closes your doors,” said Archie Ervin, the vice president for institute diversity at Georgia Institute of Technology and president of the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education. “If you have sustained enrollment drops and disproportionately full-paying students such as out-of-state, the state legislature can’t make up the gap.”
So this is what they’re telling themselves: that the massive drop in enrollments at Mizzou is because there were alleged racist taunts there, not because SJWs roiled the campus and demonstrated that the university will surrender to their crybullying. The thought that the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education are actually making things worse on campus never occurs to them, or, crucially, to the colleges that hire them. They’re all true believers.