Taking On Issues - Political Issues and Government Policies

A Hot Discussion Forum on Government Policies and Political Issues

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Election 2016
  • Big Government
  • Healthcare
  • The Other Side
  • What’s New
  • Your Freedom

Cornyn: We’ll probably give Flake his vote to protect Mueller

November 27, 2018 By Takingonissues

It’s amazing how far a little bit of leverage will go in a bare Senate majority. Jeff Flake, who retired and left the seat open for Democrat Kyrsten Sinema, declared earlier this month that he would vote to deny confirmation for any more judges until the Senate voted on legislation to protect Robert Mueller’s special counsel probe. Senate Majority whip John Cornyn told Hugh Hewitt they may give him the floor vote just to get past the obstruction — and because they don’t have much choice:

HH: Go for, it is going to be an interesting, they have a wild ride ahead of them. Senator, let’s focus on some more mundane things. First, the lame duck session of the expiring Congress, is there going to be a government shutdown, and are we going to get any nominees through with Jeff Flake’s concerns on the table?

JC: Well, we’ve got some judges on the calendar now that we can pass even if we don’t have Senator Flake’s support. But we can’t get them out of the Judiciary Committee, so we’re going to be working with Senator Flake to see what he needs in order to lift his hold. There is a possibility we will have a vote on the Mueller, so-called Mueller protection bill, but I think there really is some serious Constitutional issues on that, and I certainly don’t support it. I don’t think the president’s going to fire Bob Mueller, but we have a farm bill to take care of. There’s a lot of interest in a criminal justice reform bill. We have a Yemen war powers resolution that’s privileged and needs to be voted on this week, probably. So we’ve got a lot to do and not much time to do it in.

Hugh later returned to the same subject, and Cornyn sounded more specific about Flake getting “his shot” at the bill:

HH: So Senator Flake wants the vote on the Mueller law. I think it’s an unconstitutional law, but why not give it to him?

JC: Well, we are checking with our members now to see exactly where, you know, how it would come out. It may be that he does get that opportunity. If we can have a relatively expedited up or down vote, and my preference is that it fail, but at least he will have had his shot. And my hope is that he then will agree to let us confirm the judges that are on the calendar, because I agree it’s, they’ve been through a long, arduous process, many of them putting their practice and their families on hold while they’re waiting for confirmation. So it’s unfair to them to simply tell them to start over again next year, which is what would have to happen. So I’m hopeful we can work it out, and we’re working hard at it.

The constitutional issue relates to the president’s authority to hire and fire executive-branch personnel. Flake and others want to require that valid cause exist before a president can fire a special counsel, but that’s usually a requirement for civil-service-eligible jobs to keep politics out of terminations for non-appointee positions. Those serving in political-appointee positions do so at the pleasure of the president in an at-will relationship, not a civil-service relationship. Denying the president his authority to fire an appointee would arguably cut into his Article II authority as chief executive, especially since the special counsel exists entirely within that authority rather than in a quasi-legislative regulatory agency.

None of this matters much besides the academic value of the debate. Flake’s efforts might pass the Senate and might even pass the House, but Trump would eventually veto the bill anyway. There won’t be enough votes in either chamber to override the veto, which will leave everything in place as it is … but at least Cornyn and the GOP will have confirmed more judges in the meantime.

It’s almost certainly a moot point anyway as it’s far too late to fire Mueller now. Trump just sent over a written response to Mueller’s questions, which he would hardly have bothered to do if he planned on firing Mueller. Firing would have little impact on the progress of the case, and thanks to the results of the midterms,  would do little else but set the stage for an impeachment. If nothing else, the Democrat-controlled House Judiciary Committee could immediately appoint Mueller as its own staff counsel to pursue the rest of the case. He’s had subpoena power for almost 18 months, and has no doubt used it to the best of his ability. The only thing left is to write a report, which he could do as either special counsel or House Judiciary investigator.

So yes, the best course here is just to give Flake what he wants on his way out the door. It’s the path of least resistance … in all senses of the term.

The post Cornyn: We’ll probably give Flake his vote to protect Mueller appeared first on Hot Air.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Email, RSS Follow

Related

Subscribe to Taking on Issues

Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Political News

  • Trump cheers Covington student's lawsuit against Washington Post: 'Go get them Nick' February 20, 2019
  • Ocasio-Cortez goes on tear defending role in Amazon’s New York exit February 20, 2019
  • Is America Becoming a Four-Party State? February 20, 2019
  • The Democratic Party Is In a Socialist Spiral February 20, 2019
  • How Bernie Can Win February 20, 2019
  • Sanders Will Further Fracture the Democratic Party February 20, 2019
  • The Cabal's Untruthful Narrative About Trump February 20, 2019
  • Bring on the Green New Deal February 20, 2019
  • Sheer Madness From Ms. Ocasio-Cortez February 20, 2019

Archives

New Featured Articles

  • Are you ready for Governor Tim Pawlenty? Wait, that already happened, didn’t it?
    April 5, 2018

    We’re getting the 2012 band back together. Romney’s come out of retirement to run for Senate, now T-Paw’s headed back (hopefully) to the governor’s mansion in Minnesota. All that’s left is for Newt to run for his old House seat in Georgia. We’re probably going to need a new Speaker/minority leader next year, after all. […]

    Email, RSS Follow
    […]
  • Starving Yemen
    September 29, 2016
    IRIN Photos/Flickr: The UN-administered camp at […]
  • Boomer and Silent-Gen Fathers Sometimes Fell Short
    June 16, 2017
    I don’t want to be the Grinch of Father’s […]
  • Creating a drug culture
    April 5, 2017
    I began publishing my monthly newsletter The Bob […]
  • DoJ support in transgender murder case should come as no surprise
    October 16, 2017
    An interesting case of backhanded compliments and […]
  • Candidate says in public what she’s not allowed to say in public
    July 11, 2018
    There’s nothing quite like a good candid camera […]
  • Report: Self-driving Uber involved in fatal crash sensed pedestrian but did not react
    May 7, 2018
    In March there was a fatal crash involving a […]
  • Here we go: Pentagon considering sending group troops to northern Syria
    February 15, 2017
    posted at 8:21 pm on February 15, 2017 by Allahpundit […]
  • Former Obama CIA director Mike Morell: There is “no fire, at all” suggesting collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia
    March 16, 2017
    posted at 4:41 pm on March 16, 2017 by Allahpundit […]
  • Video: The great Juicero squeeze
    April 19, 2017
    posted at 10:01 pm on April 19, 2017 by Allahpundit To […]
  • St. Benedict Wore Prada
    December 17, 2017
    In a world where billionaire businessmen regularly […]
  • Oh my: Former USA Gymnastics chief arrested for tampering
    October 18, 2018
    The last we heard from Steve Penny, the former USA […]
  • obama can spin itObama Spin Heats Up In Political Cartoon
    October 2, 2012
    Spin, Obama, Spin The Obama spin even has Barack Obama […]
  • Muslim Reform Movement leader: ‘It is not bigotry to discuss radicalization’
    February 6, 2017
    posted at 5:01 pm on February 6, 2017 by John Sexton […]
  • Trump: House Republicans totally applauded and laughed when I made fun of Mark Sanford at our meeting
    June 20, 2018
    No they didn’t, and logic would tell you that […]
Copyright © 2019 TakingOnIssues.com

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us