Taking On Issues - Political Issues and Government Policies

A Hot Discussion Forum on Government Policies and Political Issues

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Election 2016
  • Big Government
  • Healthcare
  • The Other Side
  • What’s New
  • Your Freedom

California denies report on border duties

April 17, 2018 By Takingonissues

California is denying a report claiming National Guard troops won’t be doing any duties on the border. John wrote about the original Associated Press report yesterday claiming the state told the feds the troops would go, but wouldn’t do maintenance on vehicles or mission support for the Border Patrol. But…Via NBC 7 in San Diego:

Both a spokesperson for Governor Jerry Brown’s office and a commander with the California National Guard told NBC 7 the report is “inaccurate.”

Acting U.S. Customs and Border Protection Deputy Commissioner Ronald D. Vitiello said Brown has determined that some tasks federal officials want the state’s National Guard to perform at the U.S.-Mexico border are “unsupportable.”

Vitiello made the comments to reporters in Washington Monday after two U.S. officials told The Associated Press said terms of the federal government’s initial plans for sending National Guard troops to the border because the work is considered too closely tied to immigration.

California National Guard Lt. Col. Tom Keegan told NBC 7 that state officials have not rejected the plan since a memorandum was sent to the federal government.

“State officials have not rejected anything since the Governor responded to the federal government last Wednesday,” Keegan said. “The federal government has not yet responded. The next step is for the federal government to respond by signing the Memorandum of Agreement.”

Uh-huh.

This really strikes me as a case of public negotiation between the feds and the state. It’s petty, stupid, and also part of the nature of politics because it can involve rather ridiculous ‘negotiations’ and public hand wringing. California probably doesn’t want the National Guard on the border (because optics) while the federal government wants them (because campaign promises). Both sides are probably hoping to gin up support and make the other side look foolish through negative press. The question is whether this will resonate with anyone outside their bubble.

It should be pointed out the National Guard isn’t scheduled to do any law enforcement activities on the border. The Defense Department outlined the goals of the National Guard in DC yesterday.

The Defense Department will provide DHS with up to 4,000 National Guard troops to support the April 4 presidential memorandum authorizing the enhanced presence along the southwest border, said Robert G. Salesses, deputy assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense integration and defense support of civil authorities.

The troops will work only in operational support missions, he said, explaining their mission will not include roles in which they would interact with migrants or other people detained by DHS.

“They will not perform law enforcement functions, and they will not be placed in direct contact with personnel coming to the border,” Salesses explained.

The federal government wants National Guardsmen on the border citing increased arrest statistics in the first four months of this year. There are a couple things which are important to realize when looking at the stats. The first has to do with the fact CBP’s graph counts arrests and people told at border checkpoints they can’t come into the country. There’s definitely an increase of people trying to get in through checkpoints from this year to last year but they’re relatively consistent with statistics from 2015-2016. The amount of people being rejected by CBP at border checkpoints appears to be stable too, if I’m reading the statistics right. There was definitely an increase in people arrested trying to slip over the border without going through a checkpoint, but only by 10K or so from January to March.Border crossings are still at a 46 year low, according to the President. It’s still questionable why the National Guard would need to be on the border, and why the Border Patrol couldn’t simply move agents from one location (say the U.S.-Canada border) to another.

The situation involving the National Guard, California, and the U.S. border is just political theater and we all need to realize it. I’ve no idea who will end up blinking in this dispute between the two governmental entities, just like I’m not 100% it’s smart to send Guardsmen to the border. I’ve written before how the problem with this entire ‘illegal immigration’ discussion is the fact legal immigration is so hard. There are also constitutional questions whether the U.S. government has the right to say who can and can’t come into the country because Article 1, Section 8 says Congress can establish uniform laws of naturalization i.e. how long it takes for immigrants to become citizens. Article 1, Section 9 does mention “migration and importation” but it appears Congress is talking about slavery, not immigration. It’s just something to think about while California and the feds circle each other like a pair of baboons trying to decide who will blink first on this situation.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Email, RSS Follow

Related

Subscribe to Taking on Issues

Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Political News

  • Dem 2020 hopefuls Harris, Warren say they embrace idea of reparations for black Americans: report February 22, 2019
  • Trump Calls NYT True Enemy of the People February 22, 2019
  • Lawsuit Brought Against Trump for Damaging El Paso County February 22, 2019
  • Smollett Won't Change How Anyone Feels About Hate Crimes February 22, 2019
  • Why Vote for Sanders When You Can Have Warren Instead? February 22, 2019
  • Americans Want a Less Aggressive Foreign Policy February 22, 2019
  • National Emergency Will Haunt Trump's Re-Election Bid February 22, 2019
  • A Very British Lesson for the American Left February 22, 2019
  • Epidemic Of Anti-Jewish Hate Crimes In Brooklyn Is No Hoax February 22, 2019

Archives

New Featured Articles

  • The WIRE: Your week in review
    March 30, 2018

    From a liberty-free world to Disney’s best girls — and most points in between — it’s time for a look back at the week that was. Personal Liberty Digest® presents: The WIRE! Check out the March for Our Lives. Hundreds of thousands of ignorant people, gleefully cheering for sociopaths who plan to eliminate our civil […]

    Email, RSS Follow
    […]
  • Does Heated Rhetoric Lead to Hate Crimes?
    March 2, 2017
    The recent spate of anti-Semitic hate crimes, the […]
  • The Pencing Of Ta-Nehisi Coates
    March 31, 2017
    A progressive man who respects his wife and his […]
  • Breaking: French soldier shoots machete-armed attacker near the Louvre
    February 3, 2017
    posted at 8:36 am on February 3, 2017 by Ed Morrissey […]
  • The WIRE: Your week in review
    September 8, 2017
    From Chicagoland to the Rio Grande — and most […]
  • Another little spacecraft that could: Dawn’s photos reveal distant secrets
    July 3, 2018
    The robot interplanetary space explorers of NASA and […]
  • Great moments in journalism: NYT reporter trolling Twitter for dirt on Christian schools
    January 25, 2019
    And they wonder why people (uncharitably, to be sure) […]
  • The Case for Normalizing Relations with Iran
    August 6, 2018
    Barbara Slavin explains why Iran and the USSR are very […]
  • Really discouraging news if you like long car commutes in traffic jams
    March 17, 2017
    posted at 2:41 pm on March 17, 2017 by Andrew Malcolm […]
  • Trump’s Arms Sales Boasts and the War on Yemen
    March 26, 2018
    William Hartung responds to Trump’s boasting […]
  • Pussyhat Progressives On The March
    January 7, 2017
    The Women’s March on Washington now has an […]
  • Correcting the record on Texas crime rates
    June 1, 2018
    Criticism of justice reform efforts in Texas are the […]
  • The police-as-pigs painting hanging near the Capitol will come down next week
    January 14, 2017
    posted at 5:31 pm on January 14, 2017 by John Sexton […]
  • California wildfires burn 141,000 acres, Trump approves disaster declaration
    December 8, 2017
    The number of wildfires currently burning in southern […]
  • Stoicism, Percy, Benedict
    March 31, 2017
    Your Working Boy, Peter Augustine Lawler, and James […]
Copyright © 2019 TakingOnIssues.com

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us