Taking On Issues - Political Issues and Government Policies

A Hot Discussion Forum on Government Policies and Political Issues

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Election 2016
  • Big Government
  • Healthcare
  • The Other Side
  • What’s New
  • Your Freedom

Boston Globe to Elizabeth Warren: Don’t run

December 6, 2018 By Takingonissues

Meh. What they say here about “warning signs” is true enough. There’s already reason to believe Warren will underperform next year. But she’s one of the bigger names in the race and could move up to frontrunner if thousand-year-old Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden pass. She’d be a fool not to try. What does she have to lose?

Presidential runs seem to be in the state’s political DNA, in part because of the proximity of New Hampshire and its first-in-the-nation primary. And it’s often the right move: In 2015, this editorial page urged Warren to run, in part because of the lack of serious competition against Hillary Clinton. (Clearing the decks for Clinton didn’t exactly end well for Democrats, did it?)…

Warren missed her moment in 2016, and there’s reason to be skeptical of her prospective candidacy in 2020. While Warren won reelection, her margin of victory in November suggests there’s a ceiling on her popularity; Governor Baker garnered more votes than her in a state that is supposed to be a Democratic haven. Meanwhile, a September poll indicated that Massachusetts voters were more enthusiastic about Patrick making a White House bid than Warren.

Those are warning signs from the voters who know her best. While Warren is an effective and impactful senator with an important voice nationally, she has become a divisive figure. A unifying voice is what the country needs now after the polarizing politics of Donald Trump.

It touches my cynical heart that these naifs believe any Democrat is capable of providing a “unifying voice” in our age of vicious negative partisanship. They could have Trump switch parties and nominate him as a Democrat and righties will conclude that stopping him is the new “Flight 93 election.” Phantom unity is the dumbest possible reason for her not to run, and it may be the only reason. Why else shouldn’t she do it? If she ends up embarrassing herself, that’s a loss to her personally, not to the country. If she ends up siphoning off votes from “stronger” candidates like Sanders and Kamala Harris, well, then they maybe they weren’t so strong. I think Camille Paglia’s probably right: “Screechy Elizabeth Warren has never had a snowball’s chance in hell to appeal beyond upper-middle-class professionals of her glossy stripe.” But let’s find out.

She should run, if only for the comic blog material it’ll provide. As for her big gaffe about her Native American ancestry, this read from Joshua Green seems too clever by half. I don’t think Trump is playing three-dimensional chess, I think he’s playing one-dimensional Chutes and Ladders:

Trump’s ploy has mostly worked anyway—and that’s because it was never predicated on the genetic question of whether Warren has American Indian heritage. It was instead meant to racialize her candidacy in a damaging way. “Every day Democrats are talking about race is a day we’re winning,” Steve Bannon told me in June 2017, back when he was Trump’s chief strategist and already eyeing potential 2020 opponents. “That’s why the Pocahontas thing will kill her.”

Bannon’s hope was that Democrats could be lured into a fight over identity politics that would overshadow and undermine Warren’s populist appeal…

Regardless, Trump’s instinct about how to drive a wedge between Warren and the liberal base of her party is being borne out exactly along the lines Bannon envisioned a year and a half ago, without any acknowledgement that it’s even happening. Her own party is too busy litigating the fraught issue of identity.

Maybe the “Pocahontas” goofs are a brilliant exploit of the leftist mind’s preoccupation with racial authenticity, an ingenious way of enlisting progressives themselves to smother Warren’s economic message under a blanket of identity politics. Or … maybe it’s just Trump once again sensing that making his opponents seem ridiculous is an effective way to diminish them. “Little Marco,” “Low-Energy Jeb,” you know how the game goes. Insofar as there’s conscious strategy in his attack on Warren, it’s probably no deeper than highlighting the visual absurdity of this seemingly lily-white professor straining to be thought of as anything other than lily-white. You can spin sophisticated cultural and political analyses out of that if you like, but the visceral appeal is really no deeper than this: Look at this BS artist and the pathetic lengths to which she’ll go to seem woke. The takeaway is that she’s ridiculous, not worth taking seriously. The more the Democratic nominee is an object of ridicule, the less Trump’s own lack of gravitas matters.

There’s a bit more truth here:

There’s something very (Hillary) Clinton-esque about the Warren DNA test story and the way the press is handling it.
—Yeah she showed poor judgement.
—But it’s a minor story treated like a major crisis.
—Probably a proxy for other concerns (and/or biases).https://t.co/9uRhvnWgET

— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) December 6, 2018

She’s the one who treated it as a crisis with the DNA test and that video she made about her ancestry. You can blame the press if you like for starting it but she apparently came to agree that it had become a crisis even if it didn’t begin that way. I think Silver’s right, though, that Warren critics are being opportunistic in focusing on the DNA episode, using it as an outlet for deeper concerns they have about her. Paglia’s read is shared by many Democrats, I’m sure: Warren isn’t very likable or relatable and it’s an open question whether left-wing economic populism is so appealing in itself that it can carry a flawed messenger to victory over Trump. A choice between Warren and Clinton in 2016 would have worked in her favor because she would have worn Bernie’s insurgent halo and her progressive principles would have shone next to Hillary’s calculating centrism. In 2020, eh. What’s the case for her apart from choosing her as a compromise candidate eventually, maybe, if the field deadlocks six ways?

The post Boston Globe to Elizabeth Warren: Don’t run appeared first on Hot Air.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Email, RSS Follow

Related

Subscribe to Taking on Issues

Enter your email address to subscribe to our site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Political News

  • Dem 2020 hopefuls Harris, Warren say they embrace idea of reparations for black Americans: report February 22, 2019
  • Trump Calls NYT True Enemy of the People February 22, 2019
  • Lawsuit Brought Against Trump for Damaging El Paso County February 22, 2019
  • Smollett Won't Change How Anyone Feels About Hate Crimes February 22, 2019
  • Why Vote for Sanders When You Can Have Warren Instead? February 22, 2019
  • Americans Want a Less Aggressive Foreign Policy February 22, 2019
  • National Emergency Will Haunt Trump's Re-Election Bid February 22, 2019
  • A Very British Lesson for the American Left February 22, 2019
  • Epidemic Of Anti-Jewish Hate Crimes In Brooklyn Is No Hoax February 22, 2019

Archives

New Featured Articles

  • Jay Z is going to make a film and a documentary about Trayvon Martin
    March 24, 2017

    posted at 1:21 pm on March 24, 2017 by John Sexton Rap artist and entrepreneur Jaz Z is partnering with the Weinstein Company to create a feature film and a documentary series about Trayvon Martin. From Variety: The indie label and the rap icon won a heated bidding war for the rights to two books — […]

    Email, RSS Follow
    […]
  • Atlanta elementary school replaces Pledge of Allegiance with chant
    August 11, 2018
    It’s never too early to instill a love of […]
  • Broward police union puts up second billboard calling for the removal of Sheriff Scott Israel
    June 13, 2018
    The Broward Sheriff’s Office Deputies […]
  • The Dogs Of War Are Back
    May 14, 2018
    “As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool […]
  • Antifa militants ready to break bones, invade homes
    September 9, 2017
    Reveal published a story Tuesday titled […]
  • Great news. The IRS doesn’t know who’s been accessing your data
    May 22, 2018
    I’m glad all those problems at the IRS are […]
  • Norwegian royal: Kevin Spacey groped me at Nobel Peace Prize concert
    December 7, 2017
    Ari Behn is the former husband of Princess Martha […]
  • Trump Administration Protects Religious Liberty
    January 18, 2018
    f11photo/Shutterstock This is great news: The Trump […]
  • Science confirms: Conservatives are better looking
    January 10, 2017
    posted at 10:21 pm on January 10, 2017 by Allahpundit […]
  • Welcome To Mount Athos
    February 5, 2017
    Mount Athos, Greece A reader is on pilgrimage at Mount […]
  • Comcast is being smacked down by the FCC, but not for the real reason they should be
    October 12, 2016
    posted at 4:31 pm on October 12, 2016 by Jazz Shaw […]
  • Hmmm: Ford hires former Clinton, Biden adviser as potential hearing sherpa as attorneys bargain for time; Update: Former Anita Hill sherpa?
    September 20, 2018
    Might Chuck Grassley soon receive an RSVP in the […]
  • Withdrawing the withdrawal? US to leave hundreds of troops in Syria indefinitely
    February 22, 2019
    Two months after Donald Trump declared victory in […]
  • Report: DNC drops partnership with Women’s March as co-chair Carmen Perez admits fault
    January 15, 2019
    The Jewish News Syndicate is reporting this morning […]
  • That voter ID law in Texas is back
    April 28, 2018
    The on again, off again voter ID law in Texas has now […]
Copyright © 2019 TakingOnIssues.com

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us